durazo0
07-22-2009, 08:53 PM
In their countersuit they are asking for $100,000,000.:eek::thmbup:
|
View Full Version : Viewtech countersues Echostar durazo0 07-22-2009, 08:53 PM In their countersuit they are asking for $100,000,000.:eek::thmbup: kenmoresp 07-22-2009, 08:56 PM crap....can't open the file... wildman25276 07-22-2009, 08:57 PM Creative lawyers? WOW! Now that's the way to bring them to their knees! smbober 07-22-2009, 09:03 PM crap....can't open the file... I am getting a file damaged error from 7-zip. Anyone else see issues with the file? wildman25276 07-22-2009, 09:09 PM I am getting a file damaged error from 7-zip. Anyone else see issues with the file? Dialup here so I can't verify for at least 10 minutes. Waiting patiently for the cliff notes. musky 07-22-2009, 09:11 PM Dialup here so I can't verify for at least 10 minutes. Waiting patiently for the cliff notes. cant open either. quky 07-22-2009, 09:14 PM My either from my iPhone :eek: alten 07-22-2009, 09:16 PM Couldn't open the first one so here it is again. If someone else loads, just delete this. thks. ollie502 07-22-2009, 09:17 PM In their countersuit they are asking for $100,000,000.:eek::thmbup: Corrupt file. alten 07-22-2009, 09:23 PM ollie502. Did you try the zip file above your post? ollie502 07-22-2009, 09:26 PM Couldn't open the first one so here it is again. If someone else loads, just delete this. thks. What's new about July 7, 2008?? durazo0 07-22-2009, 09:30 PM Please use WINrar to open it..if not I'll upload it again..sorry.. TheRiddler 07-22-2009, 09:32 PM these are old back when attention was draw,that echo made its own style free to air. has nothing to do with the latest events of three that where arrested. grandtri 07-22-2009, 09:32 PM very interesting... what happens if Viewsat wins a settlement that puts them in control of Dn? Where would that leave us? durazo0 07-22-2009, 09:46 PM Sorry, file was corrupted from source...If someone could tell me how to fix file(or if somebody could fix it from my attachment), would be much appreciated. Slip 07-22-2009, 09:51 PM Great post Kinetic 07-22-2009, 09:53 PM David vs. Goliath with reference to the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. It's a pretty good spin especially since EchoStar sells FTA receivers too. Anti-competition slant with lots of Viewtech disclaimers. With the right jury, it could easily result in a hung jury on both sides of the case or a token damage award of $1500 either way which we have already seen. I would be surprised to see any large awards for either side with this countersuit. I figure everybody pays their own legal bills and a precedent is set. Then you have to be careful that as a distributor you do not participate in pirating as it creates a conflict of interest which is a whole different case with the smaller businesses. Just my HO. cybertek 07-22-2009, 10:10 PM The file worked for me.... Nice read. durazo0 07-22-2009, 10:20 PM Ok, here we go again, file repaired, thanks for the wait...:|> jadamk 07-22-2009, 10:31 PM This is old hat!!!!!!! Those papers were filed over a year ago and if Viewtech had won any sort of decision we would have heard by now. Also, if they had, I don't think the owner of Viewtech would have been indicted!!!!:mad: magwahed 07-22-2009, 10:33 PM I did open the file :thmbup: :thmbup: :thmbup::clap::clap::clap: durazo0 07-22-2009, 10:39 PM Thanks, it is intended to be a good read, just to give us some hope... todrod 07-22-2009, 10:40 PM As already posted earlier, this is old news. It was filed 07/07/2008 on record. Nothing to do with the latest accuations. singh917 07-22-2009, 10:49 PM thanks alten the file opens. MASTER OF DISASTER 07-22-2009, 10:54 PM LOL i was gonna say this is very old news. what hope are you trying for bro? just curious biged 07-22-2009, 10:57 PM Couldn't open the first one so here it is again. If someone else loads, just delete this. thks. Thanks got it opened good read rufa33 07-22-2009, 11:07 PM So it's old news? there is no case you mean guys? nothing new then. OK, next news! INDIOS 07-23-2009, 12:05 AM All TFA's Company should sue DN in a joint class demand !!!:|>:|>:|>:|> |