View Full Version : Shed-sized nuclear reactors set to power the world


kndtrpts
11-26-2008, 11:58 AM
Shed-sized nuclear reactors set to power the world

Miniature nuclear reactors that can run without human intervention for up to a decade will be available within five years, according to the company tasked with building them. Each one will be smaller than an average garden shed and will generate power for 20,000 homes.

The power plants will be almost impossible to attack or steal as they will be encased in concrete and buried underground. They will contain no weapons-grade material.

The reactors will cost up to $25 million (£16.5 million) each but are expected to provide cheaper energy than traditional sources such as coal and gas. As a result, the reactors could provide a crucial new energy source for developing countries or even for remote military installations. They will be delivered on the back of a lorry and will have no moving parts.

The US Government has licensed the technology to Hyperion Power Generation, a New Mexico-based company that has already started to take orders for the small power plants and aims to mass produce them by 2013.

John Deal, the company's chief executive, said: “Our goal is to produce power and electricity anywhere in the world for less than ten cents per kilowatt hour."

Figures from April this year show that the average cost of producing residential electricity in the US was 11 cents per kilowatt hour.

Mr Deal said that the new reactors would produce energy for seven to ten years before they had to be refuelled. They will produce only “a cricket ball-sized amount of waste”, he said, which would be easier to deal with than the quantities of waste created by large reactors.

The first firm order came from TES, a Czech infrastructure company specialising in water and power plants. More orders have arrived from around the world, including the Cayman Islands, Panama, the Bahamas and countries in Africa.

Mr Deal said the reactor is expected to meet diverse safety and regulatory requirements throughout the world.

“It can’t melt down,” he said. “If it goes above a set temperature point, the nuclear reactivity will on its own slow down. That’s chemistry, not us.”

The reactors will be buried to reduce the chance of their being attacked, and to eliminate the aesthetic impact on the communities that they power.



http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5205187.ece

Tony Rome
11-26-2008, 02:16 PM
Yes...I heard about this last week....this will be a great benefit to the whole world...cheap
clean and fossil fuel free energy....a great step forward........Good post my friend, thanks
Tony

ratboy
11-26-2008, 06:07 PM
Good stuff !!

pajamas
11-26-2008, 06:40 PM
I'm sure Amoco and Exxon are real pleased about this.

abritt3
11-27-2008, 12:27 AM
Interesting post bro...thanks!

pajamas
12-03-2008, 12:46 PM
Well such reactors sound like they would be beneficial to all of humanity, which is very good. I heard before that toshiba was also able to make such small-sized reactors, designed to power a limited part--like a block or a few blocks--of a big city. i hope we see these things in our lifetime and that they benefit the whole world.

Tony Rome
12-03-2008, 02:58 PM
Well such reactors sound like they would be beneficial to all of humanity, which is very good. I heard before that toshiba was also able to make such small-sized reactors, designed to power a limited part--like a block or a few blocks--of a big city. i hope we see these things in our lifetime and that they benefit the whole world.

They will have to build them terrorist free.....these things can be a ready built nuclear bomb just waiting for a terrorist attack......
Tony

dlbirtch
12-03-2008, 09:58 PM
This sounds way too cool to have a reactor in your back yard.

Grandpooba
12-03-2008, 10:03 PM
Be the first in your neighborhood to have a new atomic reactor in your home!............................................ and be the only one in your neighorhood!

1munchie
12-03-2008, 10:24 PM
Are wind and solar too dirty and unsafe? With all of the money spent elsewhere...I could easily support a safe clean energy option. The residual contamination must be a consideration no?

aairon
12-03-2008, 10:45 PM
Russians were using decaying isotopes, in conjunction with thermo couples for years, to power "scientific" satellites.
This was mainly because they didn't have the solar cell technology.
They operate on a very simple principal and will produce power for many years, 50 or more but the resultant waste is hazardous to most living things lol.
They of course deny continued use of this method, as they now have free access to the state of the art tech.
Some say it is still common practice(among all space capable countries) to use this technology in military Sat's because of the hardness to attack.

cybertek
12-03-2008, 11:02 PM
They will have to build them terrorist free.....these things can be a ready built nuclear bomb just waiting for a terrorist attack......
Tony

In the first post it said "The power plants will be almost impossible to attack or steal as they will be encased in concrete and buried underground. They will contain no weapons-grade material."